The only planner with live learning-goal coverage
You can attach goals to a period in any planner — but we compute in real time which Fælles Mål your yearly plan actually covers, and surface a ≠ plan chip the moment a forløb, content pack or lesson drifts away from the subject or grade the plan promised. One click reverts the drift, or you override it deliberately (draft-wins-with-warning).
≠ plan mismatch chip
Pick a subject or grade that doesn't match the linked period and an amber chip pops up with one-click revert. You stay in control, but never by accident.
Live coverage per period
Each yearly-plan period shows in real time which competence goals are already covered by forløb, lessons and packs — and where the gaps are.
Gap detector
AI surfaces the Fælles Mål you haven't planned yet — and suggests a forløb template or pack that closes the gap in one click.
Two-way id chain
Period → forløb → lesson prep → content pack → published material. Provenance flows both ways, so coverage stays trustworthy.
Draft-wins-with-warning
We never block your choice. A clear warning respects your professional judgement, but ensures nothing drifts silently.
Ready for the quality report
Coverage figures per subject and year group are live — no manual tally before the parents' evening or annual cycle meeting.
In the classroom
The teacher who won't miss a goal
The gap detector shows exactly which Fælles Mål are missing — and closes them with a forløb template.
Subject team sharing a yearly plan
All teachers see the same coverage. No double work, no overlap, no gaps.
School leader before the quality report
Coverage per year group exports live — without teachers having to compile anything.
Why this is a leapfrog
Most planners let teachers attach Fælles Mål to a period — but none compute in real time whether the plan actually covers the subject and grade it promises, and none warn when a forløb or lesson drifts. Some have no goal picker in their planning surface at all. Result: coverage is computed by hand, if at all.
- No mismatch warning
- No live coverage status
- No one-click revert
We've locked the id chain from yearly-plan period all the way down to published learning content, so provenance can be computed in both directions. That makes two capabilities possible: a mismatch chip that pops the moment drift happens, and a coverage bar per period that updates live. Research (Wiliam 2018, Hattie 2012, Marzano 2017) is unambiguous that pupil outcomes rise when planning starts from the goal — we make that operational.
- Mismatch chip with one-click revert
- Live coverage per subject and year group
- Two-way provenance — period ↔ pack
Research base
Live coverage is grounded in international planning research and the Danish national curriculum.
- Wiliam, D. (2018). Embedded Formative Assessment (2nd ed.) — Planning that backwards-maps from intended learning. Solution Tree Press
- Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers — Teacher clarity (d=0.84), learning intentions and success criteria. Routledge
- Marzano, R. (2017). The New Art and Science of Teaching — Curriculum coverage and progression. Solution Tree Press
- Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet (2023). Fælles Mål — fag og formål for grundskolen. emu.dk source
- Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet (2024). Fagfornyelsen 2026 — rammer og udrulningsplan. uvm.dk source
- OECD (2020). Curriculum (Re)design — A series of thematic reports from the OECD Education 2030 project. OECD Publishing source
- Department for Education (UK) (2014). The national curriculum in England — Framework document. GOV.UK source
Frequently asked questions
Ready to try it?
Get a free demo for your school — we'll show you the whole platform in 30 minutes.